NASA is stepping up its efforts to place a nuclear reactor on the Moon’s surface before the end of this decade. The goal is part of a broader project to create a permanent lunar base capable of supporting human missions and future deep space operations.

According to reports from U.S. media, the initiative aims not only to meet scientific needs but also to respond to the actions of other countries, such as China and Russia, which have already announced similar plans for the coming decades. Experts warn that while the technology could ensure continuous energy on the Moon, it also raises geopolitical and security concerns.
Why nuclear power on the Moon?
A lunar day is roughly 28 Earth days, with about half of that time in constant sunlight and the other half in complete darkness. This makes solar power unreliable as the sole source of energy. Nuclear reactors, on the other hand, could provide uninterrupted power, essential for keeping habitats and equipment running.
Initially, NASA plans to deploy a reactor capable of generating 100 kilowatts, enough to support basic life support systems and experiments. While modest compared to a terrestrial wind turbine (which produces 2–3 megawatts), the project could be scaled up in the future.
International race and challenges
The announcement has reignited the atmosphere of a “new lunar race,” as China and Russia plan to install an automated nuclear power station by 2035. Scientists say a functioning reactor could be operational on the Moon by 2030, provided there is funding and regular launches to deliver the necessary infrastructure.
However, transporting radioactive material into space requires special licenses and extreme safety measures, in addition to relying on the success of the Artemis Program, which aims to send astronauts and heavy cargo to the Moon.
Political issues
There is also a strategic backdrop. Installing a reactor could allow a country to establish “safety zones” around its base, restricting the approach of others. This concept is included in the Artemis Accords, signed by several nations, but it raises concerns about potential territorial disputes.
Despite the ambition, experts note that the project still faces uncertainties, from budget cuts to delays in planned missions. As one researcher put it:
“There’s no point in having nuclear power ready if there are no people or equipment on the Moon to use it.”

More
♻️ Recycling Space Debris Could Be the Key to Keeping Earth’s Orbit Safe
Juice Probe Captures Images of Active Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS, Suggesting Possible Double Tail
Largest Collection of Fossilized Carnivorous Dinosaur Tracks Ever Found Surprises Scientists in Bolivia